"TAKING THE INDIVIDUAL AS ITS FUNDAMENTAL SUBJECT, LIBERALISM UNDERTAKES A PROCESS OF DECONSTRUCTION OF THE BONDS, LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS IMPOSED ON THE PERSON...."
-ALBERTO R. ZAMBRANO
THE FAMILY, NOT THE INDIVIDUAL, SHOULD BE THE FOCUS OF A RIGHTWING SOCIAL ORDER
PUBLISHED: 15th June, 2018 | By ALBERTO R. ZAMBRANO
The emergence, expansion and officialization of gender ideology in the West is not accidental. It is not a random event, unpredictable or disconnected from the history of political-philosophical thought in our hemisphere. Even less of external infiltration, of some kind of ad hoc manipulation from the outside, as in the fantastic narrative of the conservative right, which seems hellbent on seeing KGB agents everywhere.
At the root of the gender ideology, there is the exaltation of the individual and, therefore, the liberal political philosophy and liberalism as a political position.
The smallest particle of an element is capable of keeping all of the properties of said element, progressives, libertarians and liberals consider that the smallest particle of the society is the individual. Therefore, every single one of their policies takes that starting point.
The most extreme case of this vision of society is that of communism, which considers that it is so necessary that each individual has the same rights and powers as everyone else, that any difference whatsoever that may exist is deemed an injustice that needs to be abolished.
This is the root of social justice and cultural Marxism, this is also why communism albeit being considered a radical political view, is really only a step away of what any progressive, liberal, or anarcho-libertarian will consider correct. A true right winger will not share these kinds of opinions, that of which considers the individual to be the smallest particle of society.
Taking the individual as its fundamental subject, liberalism undertakes a process of deconstruction of the bonds, limitations and prohibitions imposed on the person, in addition to their separation from all the collective elements that make them who they are.
The first step was in the religious sphere, with a speech directed against the Catholic tradition in favor of "religious freedom" after the Protestant Reformation. The "individual" was limited by the obligations and obligations of religious content that received official support from the state.
For true right wingers, the smallest particle of society is not the individual, but the absolute nuclear family. A family is a group of people that share a blood bond, that live in the same space, speak the same language, share a past, live a present and prospect for the future.
For true right wingers, family is some sort of micro-cosmos, a miniature mirror of the concept of Nation because it has the same properties as a Nation. If you divide the family into individuals, they stop sharing those properties because they are alone, on their own.
The concept of “civil society" is born as a sphere built in opposition to the state, and whose essence is based on the continuous effort to "liberate" the individual from all kinds of religious, political, cultural, economic, and moral ties, whose support It is generally in the state.
A few, however, liberal ideology turns against all forms of social compromise, accused of collectivism, and seeks the “liberation" of the individual with respect to the rest of society. At the end of the twentieth century, liberalism is directed against nations: individuals must be free to come and go, emigrate, emigrate and emigrate. Customs barriers are bad. It is better to pay cheaply for Chinese scrap than to support national industrial development. "Nation" is something that is only relevant in sports competitions.
Freed from any public religion, social obligations and the nation, what is left? That is where the liberal deconstruction enterprise of man begins because of the gender ideology. After all, gender is also a form of collective identity, since "man" and "woman" are categories of collective belonging. In this stage of liberalism, sex and gender are relativized to the point of irrelevance and interchangeability.
An individual is a bundle of experiences and characteristics, lacking context and links, to base a nation upon individuals, as liberals, progressives and libertarians wish for is to base a nation upon nothingness because random individuals share very little in common. This is why the left seeks to abolish borders and include every single individual without a criterion of relationship.
For anyone not being a leftist, this seems as madness, but for the leftist, it is of upmost importance.
All this is part of a process of endless liberation. It is a big snowball that has no objective beyond the realization of a perpetual liberation as an end in itself in relation to any type of membership.
What remains today, then, of that individual who is the center of liberalism? Nothing more than an abstraction, something insubstantial, progressively deprived of any concrete affiliation (without religion, without community, without nation, without gender).
Right wingers have a notion of nation much better formed, a nation is blood, soil, culture and the experiences that people live on it. Family is also blood, soil, culture and the experiences of its members. For right wingers, a nation isn’t composed of individuals but of the links that join those individuals together. A group of individuals with shared links is a family, the smallest unit of civilization which upholds every property and quality mentioned in this text earlier.
In this sense, the next steps are obvious. To the extent that the human condition itself has a collective character, after the deconstruction of gender identity, we will have before us the deconstruction of human identity. We have already begun to see things like this, with people making bodily changes in the attempt to convert each more time in animals. Cartoons like south park have also pointed in that direction.
That is where post-liberalism (liberalism to such a hegemonic degree that its assumptions become normal) will lead us to the post. The human will be considered as a mere alternative among others, which can be chosen or rejected, if adopted or abandoned. Enter amalgam attempts with machines, bioengineering to promote hybridization with animal species, projects to load human consciousness into the clouds. If today there is "gay pride", tomorrow there will be a parade of "robotic pride" and things like that.
It is then, a fundamentally nihilistic project, in the negative sense of the term. It is an infinite disintegration of the person, in a linear process that begins in the thought illustration that, when identifying in state authority and in religious authority forms of tyranny, inevitably returns that judgment to all forms of authority, considering their own Order, etc., as bad in themselves, making them objects of deconstruction.
Any mythology about the KGB, the Frankfurt school, cultural Marxism and the nonsense of the type thus dies. As Kant already raved against the parental family authority, the seeds of gender ideology are in the very roots of liberalism. And your next steps are already planned.
There is no way to combat this problem without uprooting the evil.
FOR A NEW FASCISM IS THE SECOND FULL LENGTH DOCUMENTARY FILM BY RICHARD HEATHEN AND LIBERTY MACHINE NEWS
IF YOU ENJOY OUR CONTENT AND WOULD LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE. SIMPLY DONATE THE PRICE OF A PINT, CHEERS.