"LIBERALS UNWITTINGLY BEHAVE IN PRECISELY THE SAME MANNER AS THE TOTALITARIAN VILLAINS OF HISTORY THEY CLAIM TO OPPOSE..."
LIBERAL SUPREMACISM – TODAY’S WHITE MAN’S BURDEN
PUBLISHED: 8th May, 2017 | By RIK STOREY
For all their railing against the dynamically dominant civilizations of Europe, especially against imperialism, liberals unwittingly behave in precisely the same manner as the totalitarian villains of history they claim to oppose. The only difference is that they wish to impose a globalist, rather than a nationalist, version of liberalism, promoting hyper-individualism. So, basically, they are imposing a hatred of whites and the rejection of all forms of collective identity, rather than simply replacing pre-existing ones with an identity resembling the white man’s. Liberals are no less guilty of universalizing their ideas and violently forcing them on the world.
Ricardo Duchesne pointed out as much in his underappreciated book, The Uniqueness of Western Civilization. He identifies the behaviour of the left, especially in their desire to see all converted to their ideology, as driven by the same spirit which has historically caused Europeans to dominate others for the sake of imposing their principles on them; principles, of course, which they perceive to be universally important. This is the liberal white man’s burden – it has been shaping the world for decades and with tremendous urgency.
Today, our political spectrum is no more than two sides of the same coin – left and right liberals (socialists and neocons) – wishing to see the breakdown of all humanity into mere economic units. Fascism and Communism were defeated and now they are set to dominate the scene. The violence of their imperialism is best represented by the celebrations, whether left or right, of Donald Trump’s recent missile attack in Syria, against the wishes of those who elected him for his anti-war campaign promises.
For all their rhetoric regarding decolonization, the liberals have attempted to colonize and proselytize the world themselves. Most countries have transformed, in significant part, into soulless wastelands of consumerism as identity. Those who admire the colonialism of the Enlightenment era boast of improvements in healthcare, education and industry for the third world; today, the liberals boast of improved individual rights and technology to justify their endeavours. They sugarcoat their hypocrisy with euphemisms such as ‘soft power’, which is no less the replacement of native, national, cultural or religious or, indeed, any collective identity than that of Protestant and Jesuitical Christendom – burdened white men past.
The similarities don’t stop there. Foreign lands (with no real connection to the West) are ravaged by war and, then, Merkel et al. call for third-world refugees to travel across the seas, heartlessly uncaring for how many will perish in the voyage, only for them to have their roots publicly denied, through threat of force. It all sounds like the international slavery bemoaned by the liberals (as they denigrate the only civilization to put an end to the practice). All this is to assimilate foreigners into the multicultural global community as an economic unit, knowing no racial, ethnic, religious or cultural ties. Perhaps the only difference with the Western slave trade is that the white man is the one thrashed like Kunta Kinte; Middle-Eastern immigrants, for instance, are given a much easier time, in order to bring down the stronger majority population, currently representing the greatest threat to the removal of all identity. Make no mistake, the aggression is just as palpable; one’s reputation and very employability depend on whether one has accepted liberal orthodoxy.
Today, to declare yourself a lover of European civilization, let alone one who wishes to see it demographically preserved, is rank heresy. Such a suggestion leads to identity, national pride, nationalism and all manner of threats to globalist liberalism. No, better to whip it out of them and fill them with guilt and ostracism if they so much as suggest that their country is built on more than the idea of liberalism. All manner of derogatory terms are preserved for such as these, the symbolic yet equally effective stripes across the back as Kunta Kinte is told, ‘Your name’s Toby’.
Looting too! How could we forget about the looting? It has even become the mainstream academic opinion that the West was able to advance so far beyond even China, since the late mediaeval period, because of material as well as cultural looting from colonial territories. Of course, the fact that the GDP of colonial European countries was minute or that those countries which didn’t engage in such activities were also successful, is untouched. The liberals remain just as silent as far greater lootings occur every day, across the world, as international elites steal even from future generations through purposely installed central banks.
Yet, the garden variety liberal doesn’t seem to realise the hypocrisy of their own totalitarianism, imperialism and witch-hunting; such is the depth of their delusion. Duchesne asks,
"Is not the emphasis on cultural pluralism a form of universalism that requires modes of reflective reasoning (metacultural, historical, and anthropological) that are/were unavailable in other cultures and that threaten/have threatened the particular traditions and standards of diverse cultures? Can Westerners defend their liberal values by tolerating values which negate these liberal values? Should Westerners be deprived of their own particular traditions in the name of the universal promotion of pluralism and diversity?"
As the alt-right continues to oppose liberalism, in all its forms, we can use the identification of their totalitarianism as a means of putting them on the back-foot, requiring them to reflect on their views. This is more pertinent now than ever, as Trump has betrayed the non-interventionist sentiments of his supporters. With Steve Bannon removed from the national security council, voices critical of liberalism will have quietened in the ears of the most powerful man in the world. Let us make ours heard and give liberalism pause for thought.
IF YOU ENJOY OUR CONTENT AND WOULD LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE. SIMPLY DONATE THE PRICE OF A PINT, CHEERS.