"AMERICA'S NEOCONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT IS FILLED WITH SUCH FORMER TROTSKYISTS WHO'VE UNLEASHED AN UNPRECEDENTED FOREIGN POLICY THAT LED TO THE COLLAPSE OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY..."
BILL KRISTOL AND THE COMMUNIST ROOTS OF NEO-CONSERVATISM
PUBLISHED: 1st February, 2018 | By ROMAN GARZA
In recent news, FOX News Host Tucker Carlson was criticized by well-renowned Neoconservative Bill Kristol. Kristol claimed that what Tucker Carlson 'does' on TV is "close to racism" and after stumbling on his words, almost saying "white nationalism" or "supremacy" he states that he doesn't know if it's racism, but "ethno-nationalism of some kind let's call it."
Well, that's right Billy, it is a type of nationalism. A type of nationalism you wouldn't prefer, but that's a different subject for a different day. There's nothing publicly available that could tie Tucker Carlson with any kind of pro-white advocacy, but he certainly humiliates leftists on his show and is favored by many of us so called "racists" for his stances and being very pro-American Nationalist in his perspective on immigration policy. This is a sort of time where we agree with leftists for the wrong reasons, shall we say.
Why has FOX News, a media corporation that is basically in the left's pocket, getting criticized by essentially its viewership, the neocons? Well, with the advent of Tucker Carlson's late time slot on FOX News, there's been a somewhat firebrand pushback of conservatism on the Right. The result is the normalization of true rightwing positions by FOX News. This is not in the interests of rootless cosmopolitans like Bill Kristol, and many other neocons.
The neoconservative movement has been a problem since its formation by none other than Bill Kristol's father, Irving Kristol in the 1930's. Irving Kristol once proudly admitted that:
“[The] honor I most prized was the fact that I was a member in good standing of the Trotskyist Young People’s Socialist League.”
You see where this is going? The root of the neocon movement is that of reactionary and pragmatic communists, which shifted into a new movement as a result of a growing wariness towards communism in the 1930's. They then rebranded themselves in order to effectively subvert even further.
Former neoconservative Francis Fukuyama compared the movement to Leninism, a variant of communism. Irving Kristol, also bragged about how his Jewish intellectual comrades such as Nathan Glazer of Harvard, Philip Selznick of Berkeley, Peter Rossi of Johns Hopkins, Merroe Berger of Princeton, I. Milton Sacks of Brandeis, and Seymour Melman of Columbia were not only Trotskyists but were unquestionably the most feverishly articulate in indoctrinating students into their worldview.
Kristol argues in his book The Neoconservative Persuasion that those Jewish intellectuals did not forsake their revolutionary ideology when they gave up communism and other revolutionary movements, but had to make some changes in their thinking. America's neoconservative movement is filled with such former Trotskyists who've unleashed an unprecedented foreign policy that led to the collapse of the American economy. Australian economist John Quiggin made the point that these are zombie ideas, ideas that bury themselves under a new banner and new cause, only to eventually show themselves for what they are, and have to be killed once again.
These zombie-like characteristics of an ideology that refuses to die are very telling and only point to communism. We can see this in the modern day in those like Irving's son, Billy, who are employing word tactics and pushing back against the truth in order to influence those unaware into his Trotskyite worldview. Yet, it is not Leon Trotsky, but Lev Davidovich Bronstein, which further shows the majority Jewish influence and control of the Bolshevik Revolution in the late 1910's, and also shows the over-representation of them in Trotskyist movements in the United States, and then their transformation into the neoconservatives.
When the Neoconservatives came along, the United States became the attack dog of the Israeli lobby, these neocons found there way into positions of power and began to have a increasingly powerful influence on foreign policy decisions. This marked the subversion of the traditional American rightwing. These pseudo-right wing leftist war mongers worked to destroy any semblance of order in the Middle East. Former Secretary of Defence Robert Gates made it clear that the Israelis do not and should not have a monopoly on the American interests in the Middle East. For that, he was chastised by neoconservative Elliott Abrams.
In that sense, the neoconservative movement is a blight on the United States, and is a threat to peace and order around the world. It subtly and deceptively seeks to undermine what America and its people stood for and replace it with what the Founding Fathers would have considered an abominable foreign policy.
Now it is understandable why the neocons, by any means necessary, would turn the American People against their own wit and use them for their own nefarious deeds. They'll use the same racebaiting, outlandish, underhanded and subversive tactics as the left to get what they want. This is because they are the left, merely masquerading as the right. They are a kind of militaristic and imperial reincarnation of Communism with no precedence in American culture or political history, and push a policy of that subverts the interests of America for those of Israel. It's time we see these neocons for what they are - nothing but a cabal of crypto-communists.
IF YOU ENJOY OUR CONTENT AND WOULD LIKE TO CONTRIBUTE. SIMPLY DONATE THE PRICE OF A PINT, CHEERS.